The above table reflects the percentage of males and female
who have been involved in the study. However, the percentage of the male has
been spotted at 54% while the percentage of female employees was 46% less than
male. There are no such specific reasons because the researcher has chosen the
non-probabilistic convenient sampling.
Reliability
|
Reliability
Statistics
|
|
Cronbach's
Alpha
|
N
of Items
|
|
.813
|
10
|
The
above table shows the percentage of internal consistency and a degree which
defines the extent to which an assessment produces stable results. The table
shows the Cronbach alpha of .813 which declares a very good reliability and
consistency. This suggests that the scale which has been chosen for the testing
is reliable and comprises of high internal consistency.
Regression
|
Model
Summary
|
|
Model
|
R
|
R
Square
|
Adjusted
R Square
|
Std.
An error of the Estimate
|
|
1
|
.785a
|
.616
|
.611
|
1.88382
|
|
a.
Predictors: (Constant), talent management, performance appraisals, career
management
|
The
above table reflects the model summary of regression that depicts the value of
R and R square. The value of R represents a simple correlation, however, the
value of R is .785 which indicates a high rate of correlation. On the other
hand, R square indicates the percentage at which the dependent variable has
been explained by the independent variables thus it must be high in order to
obtain a significant level. The R square is 61% which predicts that the
dependent variable has been explained at 61% by all the independent variables.
|
ANOVAa
|
|
Model
|
Sum
of Squares
|
df
|
Mean
Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
|
1
|
Regression
|
1401.225
|
3
|
467.075
|
131.616
|
.000b
|
|
Residual
|
872.999
|
246
|
3.549
|
|
|
|
Total
|
2274.224
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
a.
Dependent Variable: EmployeePerformance
|
|
b.
Predictors: (Constant), talentManagement, PerformanceAppraisals,
CareerManagement
|
The
above table of ANOVA reflects the regression model and explains the
significance of the variables. The relationship between the dependent and
independent variables is significant when the p value is less than 0.05. The
above table reflects that the sig value is <0.05 which means that there is a
significant relationship between employee performance (dependent variable) and
all the independent variables including talent management, performance appraisals,
and Career management.
|
Coefficientsa
|
|
Model
|
Unstandardized
Coefficients
|
Standardized
Coefficients
|
t
|
Sig.
|
|
B
|
Std.
Error
|
Beta
|
|
1
|
(Constant)
|
2.677
|
.684
|
|
3.913
|
.000
|
|
CareerManagement
|
.737
|
.109
|
.401
|
6.740
|
.000
|
|
PerformanceAppraisals
|
.409
|
.094
|
.221
|
4.354
|
.000
|
|
talentManagement
|
.528
|
.118
|
.274
|
4.480
|
.000
|
|
a.
Dependent Variable: EmployeePerformance
|
The
table above explains the coefficient analysis which provides a clear insight
into the relationship between the dependent variable with all the independent
variables. It predicts the significance of employee performance with the entire
model. Moreover, the regression model or equation could be reflected as
Employee
performance= 2.677+0.737 (career management)
Employee
performance= 2.677+0.409 (performance appraisals)
Employee
performance= 2.677+0.528 (talent management)
The
entire test reveals the result that if TUS airways implement the succession
planning strategies regarding career management, performance appraisals, and
talent management then they could be able to lift up the employee performance
level.
With
respect to the qualitative survey, the analysis has been done on the basis of
past research papers which illustrates that the implementation of succession
planning has become vital in order to ensure continued success in the
organization. It might help the company to identify and integrate the right
roles for the critical job placements that might help in ensuring success in
critical times. Presently, the contemporary businesses of all sizes have been
focusing on the implementation of succession planning that ensures the leadership
in the company. Those companies who do not follow succession planning could
create an adverse impact on the future of an organization. Through the
implementation of succession planning the companies might be able to train the
right person for the leadership position so that he or she might be able to
mentor other in the future. In this way, the business could be able to attain
short term and long term plans and also obtain perfect structuring of the
business.
As
per the analysis, the management has been considered as fully responsible for
the management of succession planning. Only the planning of a succession
strategy is not important the companies must be able to manage the succession
planning process. All the stakeholders, directors and partners must be involved
in the process. The proper implementation of the succession planning might
acquire a great deal of success in enhancing both technical and managerial
roles. Succession planning process has not been considered as complex, however,
by focusing on the important factors of succession planning such as career
management, talent management, and performance appraisals could help the
company to obtain good succession planning. The consideration of succession
planning and management has been seen to be noteworthy in this contemporary
world because it could help in restructuring the organization roles as per
their objectives. Moreover, the most highlighted people who must be provided
with succession planning are those who are nearby retirement process. This
would create a sense of respect for those people who have served years of
knowledge and competencies to make continuous growth in the organization (WRS,
2018).
In
the field of human resource management, succession planning has been considered
as one of the essential and broader perspectives to work on. In the succession
planning and management, there is a systematic integration of identifying,
developing and retaining the employees to obtain the objectives successfully.
The
above diagram reveals the steps that help an organization to manage the
succession planning process. It includes identification of key positions and
areas, assessment of competencies required for the positions, identification of
right candidates, implementation plans for the succession plans and evaluation
of effectiveness.
There
are some key areas and positions in the organization that are critical and
needs to be implemented under the strategy to obtain the certain objective. In
order to accomplish the succession planning process, it is important to fill up
the key critical positions. If the company would be unable to finalize those
critical roles and responsibilities then they would not be able to obtain the
goals and objectives. In order to identify key position and areas, the companies
must make risk assessment by analyzing the past performances. This could help
the company to decrease the risk rate.
The
evaluation and determination of the key competencies are also one of the core
competency to manage succession planning. For this the companies must set up
the criteria for the employment efforts and expectations thus the management
must also involve in finding relevant knowledge, skills and abilities of the
employees to identify what will they be able to accomplish performance
expectation. Moreover, there must be a crystal clear understanding of the
competencies that are needed to obtain the succession planning objective. The
companies must take the support of profiling to assess the actions and
performance of employees as this might help the company to explore the skills
and competencies that are required for the particular objective (TBS, 2018).
After
certain steps, the company must evaluate the determination of the employees who
are interested to fill the critical positions. For this, the management must
share sustainable career plans to boost up the interest of employees and also
identifies those employees who could work hard to develop their position in the
specific job. The implication of healthy human resource management strategies
might help the company to explore internal hidden talent and expertise to
accomplish the idea of succession planning.
There
must be the proper incorporation of the strategies regarding training and
development to transfer the corporate knowledge in making the succession
planning effectively. For this, the company must define the processes related
to learning and training to obtain the major leadership positions. It helps in
turning the strategies into actions and provides a clear timeline for the roles
and responsibilities of employees.
After
the succession plan and implementation, companies must make effort to evaluate
the effectiveness of the process. The evaluation seems to be successful if the
key positions would be filled quickly and if the employees would get stable in
performing effectively as per their roles. The workforce must be monitored
systematically on daily basis in order to make continuous adjustments for the
successful succession planning (Bruns, 2018).
The
research relies on evaluating the impact of succession planning on the employee
performance level in the Tus airways in Cyprus. However, the study analyzes the
main factors of the succession planning such as career management, performance
appraisals and talent management that will create an influence on enhancing the
employee performance level. Through the succession planning the employees have
been motivated to be placed in the recognized position and to attain the
sustainable future they involve in working hard by engaging in the practices of
training and development, talent management in order to perform better.
Moreover, the research highlights that the emphasis of the organization on the
factors of succession planning could positively push the employee towards
productive performance.
In
a nutshell, the research reflects the results of both qualitative and
quantitative analysis which depicts that there is a significant relationship
between the employee performances and factors related to succession planning.
This means that by creating an emphasis on the succession planning factors
could create an effective and healthy succession planning for the organization.
The researcher has also described the succession planning management process
which is helpful for the company to manage the objectives of succession
planning implementation. Although the implementation of succession planning
could be complex for some of the organizations if it would be managed
effectively by the human resource management then the company could obtain
success in the succession planning implementation.
The study generates the
effectiveness of all the stated factors regarding succession planning thus the
organizations must practically implement it in order to achieve good results.
Some recommendations that must be followed by the organizations are:
·
The management must
clearly state the short-term and long-term objectives of the organization
·
There must be strict
policies for the employees to follow the right career path
·
The performance
appraisal system must not be conducted with biased behavior
·
Proper training must
be given to the employees for their career and talent development and
management.
·
The companies must
harness the expertise of the senior management
·
The HR team must
provide external and internal training to expand the set of competencies
·
Senior management must
play a role model for other employees in order to keep them motivated
·
The management must
keep on negotiating and be retaining the old employees in order to encourage
them to work progressively.
Ahmad.
R, & Bujang. S, 2013 Issues, and challenges in the practice of performance
activities in the 21st century. International Journal of education and research
Vol. 1 (4)
Andersen,
L. B., & Pedersen, L. H. 2012. Public Service Motivation and
Professionalism. International Journal of Public Administration, 35 (1): 46-57.
Appelbaum,
S., Benyo, C., Gunkel, H., Ramadan, S., Sakkal, F. and Wolff, D. 2012.
Transferring corporate knowledge via succession planning: analysis and
solutions - Part 1. Industrial and Commercial Training, 44(5), pp. 281-289.
Arthur,
J.B 1994; "Effects of Human Resources Systems on Manufacturing Performance
and Turnover" Academy of Management Review 37:670-687
Augustine,
B. Kanemoto, C. 2009. Workforce and succession plan. The Department's
commitments to the development of its employees and future leaders. The state
of California. Department of consumer affairs.
Bahrija
Umihanic, B., Herzegovina, & Mirela Cebic 2013. "Functions of the
Performance Appraisal System: Analyses and their Impact on Level of Employees’
Motivation." International Journal of Sustainable Economies Management,
1(1): 1-15.
Becker,
B and B. Gerhart 1996; "The Impact of Human Resources Management on
Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects". Academy of Management
Journal 39:779-801
Bersin,
2009. Executive Summary of High Impact Succession Management. Bersin &
Associates, Oakland. CA
Bigley,
G. and Wiersema, M. 2002. New CEOs and corporate strategic refocusing: how
experience as heir apparent influences the use of power. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 47(4), pp. 707-727.
Bjomberg,
A. and Nicholson, N. 2012. Emotional ownership: the next generation's
relationship with the family firm. Family Business Review, 25(4), pp. 374-390.
Bottomley,
M. 1983 Personnel Management Pitman Publishing Company, London
Bruns 2018. Succession Planning - A 5 Step Process.
[online] Www2.gnb.ca. Available at:
http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/treasury_board/human_resources/content/career_development/content/succession_planning/five_step_process.html
[Accessed 16 Jul. 2018].
Burke,
R. 2011. Human resource management in small- and medium-sized enterprises:
benefits and challenges. In Cooper, C. and Burke, R. (eds.) Human resource
management in small businesses. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, pp. 10-67.
Charan,
R. 2008. Leaders at all levels. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chiang,
C. F., & Hsieh, T. S. 2012. The impacts of perceived organizational support
and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of
organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 31, 180–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.04.011
Chrisman,
J., Chua, J., and Sharma, P. 1998. Important attributes of successors in family
businesses: an exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11(1), pp. 19-34.
Christensen,
C. R. (1953). Management succession in small and growing enterprises. Boston:
Harvard University Press
Conger,
J. A., & Fulmer, R. M. 2003. Developing your leadership pipeline. Harvard
Business Review, vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 76 – 84.
Conger,
J. and Fulmer, R. 2003. Developing your leadership pipeline. Harvard Business
Review, 81(12), pp. 76-84.
Currie,
K. 2010. Succession planning for advanced nursing practice; contingency or
continuity? The Scottish experience. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, vol. 2,
pp. 17 – 24.
Eisenberger,
R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. 2001.
Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 86, 42–51. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.86.1.42
Eisenberger,
R., Rhoades, L., & Cameron, J. 1999. Does pay for performance increase or
decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation? Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1026.
Farley,
2005. “HR‟S Role in Talent Management and Driving Business Results”. Employment
Relations Today.
Fleischmann,
S.T. 2000. Succession Management for the entire Organization. Employment
Relations Today (Wiley). 27(2): 53-62.
Fulmer,
R. M., & Conger, J. A. 2004. Developing Leaders with 2020 Vision. Financial
Executive, 20(5), 38-4
Galagan,
P. 2010. Bridging the Skills Gap: New Factors Compound the Growing Skills
Shortage. American Society for Training & Development. Retrieved June 2010
from
http://www.astd.org/Publications/Magazines/TD/TD-Archive/2010/02/Bridging-the-Skills-Gap-New-Factor
s-Compound-the-Growing-Skills-Shortage.aspx
Giambatista,
R.C., Rowe, W.G. and Riaz, S. 2005. Nothing succeeds like succession: A
Critical review of leader succession literature since 1994. The Leadership
Quarterly Vol.16 pages 963-991.
Groves,
K.S. 2006. Integrating leadership development and succession planning best
practices. Journal of Management Development, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 239 – 252.
Hall,
D.T. 1986. Dilemmas in Linking Succession Planning to Individual Executive
Learning. Human
Hargreaves,
A. and Fink, D. (2006), Sustainable Leadership. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
Helmich,
D. and Brown, W. 1972. Successor type and organizational change in the
corporate enterprise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), pp. 371-381
Hewitt,
S.D.2009. The secrets of successful succession planning in the new age wave.
Industrial and Commercial Training, 41, 181-186
Hirsh,
W. 2000. Succession Planning Demystified. The Institute for Employment Studies
Report 372.
Hutzshcenreuter,
T. Kleindienst, I. and Greger, C. 2012. How new leaders affect strategic change
following a succession event: a critical review of the literature. The
Leadership Quarterly, 23, pp. 729-755.
Iskandar,
M., Ahmad, R., & Martua, R. H. 2013. Factors Influencing Employees'
Performance: A Study of the Islamic Banks in Indonesia. International Journal
of Business and Social Science, 5 (2).
Jan,
S., Israr, M., Haq, Z., Tariq, M., & Jahangir, M. 2014. “The effect of
performance Management system on teacher’s efficiency: A case study of private
schools in district Peshawar”. Life Science Journal; 11(4):79-85.
Kesner,
I and Dalton, D. 1994. Top management turnover and CEO succession: an
investigation of the effects on turnover and performance. Journal of Management
Studies, 31(5), pp. 701-713.
Kesner,
I. F., & Sebora, T. C. (1994). Executive succession: Past, present &
future. Journal of Management, 20(2), 327–372.
Kesner,
I. F., & Sebora, T. C. 1994. Executive Succession: Past, Present, and
Future. Journal of Management, 20(2), 327-372
Koc-Menard,
S. 2009. Transfer after retirement: the role of corporate alumni networks.
Development and Learning in Organizations, 23(2), p. 9.
Leibman,
M., Bruer, R., & Maki, B. 1996. Succession Management: The Next Generation
of Succession Planning. Human Resource Planning, 19(3), 16-29.
Leland,
S., Carman, J. and Swartz, N. 2012. Understanding managerial succession
planning at the local level: a study of the opportunities and challenges facing
cities and counties. National Civic Review, Summer, pp. 44-50.
Levinson,
H. 1965. Reciprocation: The relationship between man and the organization.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 370–390. doi:10.2307/2391032
Luna,
G. 2012. Planning for an American higher education leadership crisis: the
succession issue for administrators. International Leadership Journal, 4(1),
pp. 56-79
Milkovich,
T. and Boudreau, J. 1988 Personnel /Human Resource Management: A Diagnostic
Approach 5th Edition Homewood Illinois
Mohammad,
H. K., Mehrzad, H., Mahmoud, G., & Mohammad, H. 2012. Identification of
Organizational Factors Associated with IOC Employees Performance Based on Wise
Board Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social
Sciences, 2 (6), 396-204.
National
Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). 1997. Managing succession and
developing leadership: growing the next generation of public service leaders.
NAPA: Washington, DC.
Naveen,
L. 2006. Organizational complexity and succession planning. Journal of
Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(3), pp. 661-683.
Neelam,
T., Israr, K. Y., Shahid, J., &Hashim, M. 2013. The Impact of Training and
Development on Employees Performance and Productivity: A case study of United
Bank
Nonaka,
I., von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. 2006. Organizational knowledge creation
theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8),
1179
Nzuve,
S. 2008 Management of Human Resources: A Kenya perspective Revised edition,
Basic modern management consultants, Nairob
Orpen,
C. 1994. The effects of organizational and individual career management on
career success. International Journal of Manpower, 15, 27–37.
doi:10.1108/01437729410053617
Ostrowski,
P.S. 1968. Prerequisites for Effective Succession Planning. Management of
Personnel Quarterly. 7(1): 10-16.
Peet,
M. 2012. Leadership transitions, tacit knowledge sharing, and organizational
generativity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), pp. 45-60.
Pfeffer,
J. 1998. The human equation: building profits by putting people first.
Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
Pissari,
S., Weinstein, M. and Stephen, J. 2010. The influence of cognitive
simplification processes on the CEO succession decision. Journal of Management
Research, 10(2), pp. 71-86.
Pynes,
J.E.,2004. The Implementation of Workforce and Succession Planning in the
Public Sector. Public Personnel Management. 33(4): 389-404
Reid,
J. and Gilmour, D. 2009. Succession planning: out with the old and in with the
new, or a tool for organizational success? Journal of Perioperative Practice,
19(1), pp. 2.
Reilly, P. 2008. Identifying the right course for talent management.
Public Personnel Management, 37, pp. 381-388.
Richtermeyer,
S. B.2011. Successful Succession Planning. Strategic Finance, 6, 19.
Robb,
2006. “Succeeding with Succession: tools for succession management get more
sophisticated”. HR Magazine January.
Rothwell,
W. 2010. Effective succession planning: ensuring leadership continuity and
building talent from within, 4th edition. New York: American Management
Association.
Rothwell,
W. J. 2005. Effective Succession Planning: Ensuring Leadership Continuity and
Building Talent from Within (3rd ed.). New York: American Management
Association
Seymour,
S. 2008. Boost your business value with succession planning. Human Resource
Management International Digest, 16, 3-5.
Shahzadi,
I., Javed, A., Pirzada, S. S., Nasreen, S., & Farida, K. 2014. Impact of
Employee Motivation on Employee Performance. European Journal of Business and
Management, 6 (23), 159-176.
Sheehan,
M., 2012. Developing managerial talent. Exploring the link between management
talent and perceived performance in multinational corporations (MNCs), pp. 66 -
85.
Stadler,
K., 2011. Talent Reviews: The key to effective succession management. Business
Strategy Series, 12(5), pp. 264 - 271.
Stiles,
P. and Kulvisaechana, S., 2003. Human Capital and Performance: A Literature
Review. Judge Institute of Management, University of Cambridge.
Swan,
B. A. Moye, J. P. 2009. Growing ambulatory care nurse leaders. Building talent
from the primed pipeline. Nursing Economics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 251 – 254
tbs 2018. Succession Planning and Management
Five-Step Process. [online] Tbs-sct.gc.ca. Available at:
https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/gui/spgr/spg-gpgr-02-eng.asp?for=hrps [Accessed 16
Jul. 2018].
TUS Airways 2018. Tus Airways | Book Our Flights
& Save. [online] Alternativeairlines.com. Available at:
https://www.alternativeairlines.com/tus-airways [Accessed 11 Jul. 2018].
Ubeda,
C. L., & Santos, F. C. 2013. Staff development and performance appraisal in
a Brazilian research Centre, European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1):
109- 125.
Vancil,
R. 1987. Passing the baton. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press
Weisbach,
M. 1995. CEO turnover and the firm's investment decisions. Journal of Financial
Economics, 37(2), 159-188.
Weng,
Q., & McElroy, J. C. 2012. Organizational career growth, effective
occupational commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 80, 256–265. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.014
Weng,
Q., McElroy, J. C., Morrow, P. C., & Liu, R. 2010. The relationship between
career growth and organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
77, 391–400. doi:10.1016/j. jvb.2010.05.003
Williams, D and Annon., 2006. Racial, cultural and
sociopolitical disparities in mental health administration in the United
States. African Journal of Criminology& Justice Studies, 2,
pp.63-103.
WRS 2018. The Importance of Succession Planning.
[online] Apsco.org. Available at:
http://www.apsco.org/article/the-importance-of-succession-planning-3069.aspx
[Accessed 16 Jul. 2018].
Zepeda,
S., Bengtson, E. and Parylo, O. 2012. Examining the planning and management of
principal succession. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(2), pp. 136-158